Welcome message

Welcome to LILTDY blogging.


Each of you needs to go to Blogger and create your own blog for this course. Call your blog anything you like, but be sure to include your name in the title so we know who you are. Also, be sure to send to me (krenochs@gmail.com) the url so I can post the links to your blogs and we can read and respond to each others blogs.


Each week you will have one assigned writing task related to our text, Leading at the Edge. These entries should be between 150 and 300 words.


But you can also make additional entries, and/or add links to anything that you find interesting and related to our class.


I’ll try to make my blog a good model of what is possible. To help you feel like we are all doing this together, I will do the same assignments as you.


I look forward to blogging with you.


Ken

Monday, May 16, 2011

Week Six Writing Assignment

For this assignment, I will focus on Chapter 7 "Conflict." Not only have we started on the topic of conflict resolution in class, but it is a very relevant topic for me personally with my administrative work within the ELP.

This is because the ELP has been undergoing a great deal of conflict over the last couple of years due to differing views on how we should conduct a curricular reform.

While the majority of the instructors have supported a particular set of curricular reforms, a minority of senior instructors are against the reforms. Due to feelings of not feeling respected, of accusations that have been made against them, and due to a considerable amount of "groupness" (a sense of "us" vs. "them" that has magnified the importance of the issues), this group has had great difficulty accepting the reform.

So, what can I "take away" from this chapter on Shackleton?

First, we should have "Deal[t] with Anger in Small Doses" better than we did. Legitimate concerns were expressed by the dissenting group early on that were not addressed. Efforts should have been made to have had extensive discussion and debate over these concerns, and perhaps some compromises needed to have been made. Better yet, we needed more of a conflict positive environment in which open discussion might have led to some "win-win" negotiations. Instead, the minority group felt marginalized and disenfranchised which subsequently led to feelings of intense frustration and ultimately aggression.

Secondly, we needed to have "Engage[d] Dissidents." The reform dissidents were essentially ignored. What we needed to have done is brought the dissenting voices and members "into the tent." I have always loved this notion from Shackleton, that he took the members that might pose the greatest threat to his leadership and made them members of his tent. This way he could consult with them and keep them feeling listened to and wanted, and prevent them from joining forces with others. There is an expression in English, "Keep your enemies closer and your enemies closer" which is attributed to the great Chinese military commander Sun Tsu which expresses a similar concept. We needed to have done something like this by better including our dissidents in the reform process so that they could have more of a say and be part of the reform. Not doing so has led to a lot of problems.

My efforts over the last year have been to try and make up for the past. Giving the opposition an opportunity to express themselves has been one approach. We have had several open meetings in which opposition views could be presented and discussed. More recently, opposing members have been given roles in which they could contribute in ways in which they were uniquely suited. Whether these efforts will bear fruit is still unclear, but it is hoped that some of the division and distrust and anger can be reduced as we move forward.

No comments:

Post a Comment